Skip to content

Added support for Redmi note 12 pro (sweet_k6a) #27

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 9, 2024

Conversation

Vilez0
Copy link

@Vilez0 Vilez0 commented Apr 9, 2024

Title is self explanatory 😁

@JIaxyga
Copy link
Member

JIaxyga commented Apr 9, 2024

Thanks, merged

@JIaxyga JIaxyga merged commit db7bc51 into sm7150-mainline:v6.8.3 Apr 9, 2024
Gelbpunkt pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2025
The bnxt_rx_pkt() updates ip_summed value at the end if checksum offload
is enabled.
When the XDP-MB program is attached and it returns XDP_PASS, the
bnxt_xdp_build_skb() is called to update skb_shared_info.
The main purpose of bnxt_xdp_build_skb() is to update skb_shared_info,
but it updates ip_summed value too if checksum offload is enabled.
This is actually duplicate work.

When the bnxt_rx_pkt() updates ip_summed value, it checks if ip_summed
is CHECKSUM_NONE or not.
It means that ip_summed should be CHECKSUM_NONE at this moment.
But ip_summed may already be updated to CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY in the
XDP-MB-PASS path.
So the by skb_checksum_none_assert() WARNS about it.

This is duplicate work and updating ip_summed in the
bnxt_xdp_build_skb() is not needed.

Splat looks like:
WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 5782 at ./include/linux/skbuff.h:5155 bnxt_rx_pkt+0x479b/0x7610 [bnxt_en]
Modules linked in: bnxt_re bnxt_en rdma_ucm rdma_cm iw_cm ib_cm ib_uverbs veth xt_nat xt_tcpudp xt_conntrack nft_chain_nat xt_MASQUERADE nf_]
CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 5782 Comm: socat Tainted: G        W          6.14.0-rc4+ #27
Tainted: [W]=WARN
Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME Z690-P D4, BIOS 0603 11/01/2021
RIP: 0010:bnxt_rx_pkt+0x479b/0x7610 [bnxt_en]
Code: 54 24 0c 4c 89 f1 4c 89 ff c1 ea 1f ff d3 0f 1f 00 49 89 c6 48 85 c0 0f 84 4c e5 ff ff 48 89 c7 e8 ca 3d a0 c8 e9 8f f4 ff ff <0f> 0b f
RSP: 0018:ffff88881ba09928 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00000000c7590303 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 1ffff1104e7d1610 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff8881c91300b8
RBP: ffff88881ba09b28 R08: ffff888273e8b0d0 R09: ffff888273e8b070
R10: ffff888273e8b010 R11: ffff888278b0f000 R12: ffff888273e8b080
R13: ffff8881c9130e00 R14: ffff8881505d3800 R15: ffff888273e8b000
FS:  00007f5a2e7be080(0000) GS:ffff88881ba00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007fff2e708ff8 CR3: 000000013e3b0000 CR4: 00000000007506f0
PKRU: 55555554
Call Trace:
 <IRQ>
 ? __warn+0xcd/0x2f0
 ? bnxt_rx_pkt+0x479b/0x7610
 ? report_bug+0x326/0x3c0
 ? handle_bug+0x53/0xa0
 ? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x50
 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
 ? bnxt_rx_pkt+0x479b/0x7610
 ? bnxt_rx_pkt+0x3e41/0x7610
 ? __pfx_bnxt_rx_pkt+0x10/0x10
 ? napi_complete_done+0x2cf/0x7d0
 __bnxt_poll_work+0x4e8/0x1220
 ? __pfx___bnxt_poll_work+0x10/0x10
 ? __pfx_mark_lock.part.0+0x10/0x10
 bnxt_poll_p5+0x36a/0xfa0
 ? __pfx_bnxt_poll_p5+0x10/0x10
 __napi_poll.constprop.0+0xa0/0x440
 net_rx_action+0x899/0xd00
...

Following ping.py patch adds xdp-mb-pass case. so ping.py is going
to be able to reproduce this issue.

Fixes: 1dc4c55 ("bnxt: adding bnxt_xdp_build_skb to build skb from multibuffer xdp_buff")
Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Somnath Kotur <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants