Skip to content

Conversation

klensy
Copy link
Contributor

@klensy klensy commented Dec 7, 2021

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @petrochenkov

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Dec 7, 2021
@klensy klensy changed the title rustc_serialize: don't allocate strings as key for BTreeMap, when str is enought rustc_serialize: don't allocate Strings as key for BTreeMap, when str is enought Dec 7, 2021
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 7, 2021

📌 Commit 1b27b69 has been approved by petrochenkov

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 7, 2021
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2021
rustc_serialize: don't allocate `String`s as key for `BTreeMap`, when `str` is enought
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2021
rustc_serialize: don't allocate `String`s as key for `BTreeMap`, when `str` is enought
@klensy
Copy link
Contributor Author

klensy commented Dec 8, 2021

This should affect perf (at least, this is was idea), so @bors rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 8, 2021

@klensy: 🔑 Insufficient privileges: not in try users

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@bors rollup=never

@apiraino apiraino added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Dec 9, 2021
@camelid camelid changed the title rustc_serialize: don't allocate Strings as key for BTreeMap, when str is enought rustc_serialize: don't allocate Strings as key for BTreeMap, when str is enough Dec 12, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 13, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 1b27b69 with merge 6d6d089...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 13, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: petrochenkov
Pushing 6d6d089 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Dec 13, 2021
@bors bors merged commit 6d6d089 into rust-lang:master Dec 13, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.59.0 milestone Dec 13, 2021
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (6d6d089): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant changes.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants