Skip to content

Conversation

RalfJung
Copy link
Member

r? @oli-obk

At least I hope these fixes are right, please double-check.^^

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Aug 16, 2020
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Aug 17, 2020

I don't know

r? @ecstatic-morse

@bors

This comment has been minimized.

@ecstatic-morse
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

Not sure what the "opt-const-arg" bit is, but we do run const-checking as part of mir_const_qualif.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 19, 2020

📌 Commit 75d1373 has been approved by ecstatic-morse

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 19, 2020
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2020
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#75069 (move const param structural match checks to wfcheck)
 - rust-lang#75587 (mir building: fix some comments)
 - rust-lang#75593 (Adjust installation place for compiler docs)
 - rust-lang#75648 (Make OnceCell<T> transparent to dropck)
 - rust-lang#75649 (Fix intra-doc links for inherent impls that are both lang items and not the default impl)
 - rust-lang#75674 (Move to intra doc links for std::io)
 - rust-lang#75696 (Remove `#[cfg(miri)]` from OnceCell tests)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 1f70776 into rust-lang:master Aug 19, 2020
@RalfJung RalfJung deleted the mir-comment-fixes branch August 24, 2020 08:05
@cuviper cuviper added this to the 1.47.0 milestone May 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants