Skip to content

Conversation

andrewbanchich
Copy link
Contributor

Use assert_eq and assert_ne over comparison operators.

Use assert_eq and assert_ne over comparison operators.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @joshtriplett

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 23, 2019
@joshtriplett
Copy link
Member

joshtriplett commented Sep 23, 2019

The change looks reasonable. However, could you please use a more descriptive subject than "update test"? Don't leave all the details to the body of the commit message.

r=me (and bors rollup) with that fixed.

@andrewbanchich andrewbanchich changed the title update test update mem::discriminant test to use assert_eq and assert_ne over comparison operators Sep 23, 2019
@andrewbanchich
Copy link
Contributor Author

@joshtriplett Sure, all set! Let me know if you need anything else.

r? @joshtriplett
@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 23, 2019

@andrewbanchich: 🔑 Insufficient privileges: Not in reviewers

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 23, 2019

@andrewbanchich: 🔑 Insufficient privileges: not in try users

@andrewbanchich
Copy link
Contributor Author

Whoops, so you meant I should add r? @joshtriplett and then you will @bors r+ rollup after you review? First time contributing to docs...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 23, 2019

@andrewbanchich: 🔑 Insufficient privileges: Not in reviewers

@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented Sep 23, 2019

@bors r=joshtriplett rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 23, 2019

📌 Commit 8acf958 has been approved by joshtriplett

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 23, 2019
@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented Sep 23, 2019

@andrewbanchich r=me generally means that someone with approval rights can do r=reviewer but if you don't have approval rights then you'll have to wait.

Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2019
update mem::discriminant test to use assert_eq and assert_ne over comparison operators

Use assert_eq and assert_ne over comparison operators.
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2019
update mem::discriminant test to use assert_eq and assert_ne over comparison operators

Use assert_eq and assert_ne over comparison operators.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2019
Rollup of 16 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #63356 (Issue#63183: Add fs::read_dir() and ReadDir warning about iterator order + example)
 - #63934 (Fix coherence checking for impl trait in type aliases)
 - #64016 (Streamline `Compiler`)
 - #64296 (Document the unstable iter_order_by library feature)
 - #64443 (rustdoc: general cleanup)
 - #64622 (Add a cycle detector for generic `Graph`s and `mir::Body`s)
 - #64689 (Refactor macro by example)
 - #64698 (Recover on `const X = 42;` and infer type + Error Stash API)
 - #64702 (Remove unused dependencies)
 - #64717 (update mem::discriminant test to use assert_eq and assert_ne over comparison operators)
 - #64720 ( remove rtp.rs, and move rtpSpawn and RTP_ID_ERROR to libc)
 - #64721 (Fixed issue from #64447)
 - #64725 (fix one typo)
 - #64737 (fix several issues in String docs)
 - #64742 (relnotes: make compatibility section more sterile and fix rustc version)
 - #64748 (Fix #64744. Account for the Zero sub-pattern case.)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 8acf958 into rust-lang:master Sep 25, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants