Skip to content

Conversation

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @huonw

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor Author

oli-obk commented May 23, 2015

sorry about that :/ i thought it'd create that branch in my repos only. well, now that it's done I'm at least running make check

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor Author

oli-obk commented May 23, 2015

stage1 passes

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor Author

oli-obk commented May 23, 2015

make check passes

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Contributor

@bors: r+ p=1

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 23, 2015

📌 Commit 251481f has been approved by steveklabnik

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Contributor

@bors: r-

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Contributor

wait a minute, why does this have 17 PRs when theres only seven in the queue that are open?

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor Author

oli-obk commented May 23, 2015

there are some that are already merged

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor Author

oli-obk commented May 23, 2015

oh + the rollup PRs

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Contributor

are you on IRC? I'm confused.

@oli-obk oli-obk force-pushed the rollup branch 2 times, most recently from 2b803dc to 882af3f Compare May 23, 2015 16:37
steveklabnik and others added 16 commits May 23, 2015 18:37
Also, when checking for common gendered words elsewhere, I found one 'he', moved to 'they' as well.

rust-lang#25640 (comment)
Took me a moment to figure out that the appropriate response to
"need program file" was to install the program named "file", not
to think "If I didn't need the program file, why would I be
compiling things?".
The `run` function passed its argument to `msg` via `"$@"`, but `msg`
only printed its first argument. I think the intention was for `msg` to
print all its arguments. (If not, `run` should only `msg "$1"`.)
There are more possible optimizations left (cached length in loops) as
well as some possible bugs (shadowed variables) to fix. This is mostly
syntactic.
I consider that this version has a better reading fluency, instead of having a period between clauses
@oli-obk oli-obk closed this May 23, 2015
@oli-obk oli-obk deleted the rollup branch May 23, 2015 16:46
@Centril Centril added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Oct 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.