Skip to content

Conversation

Kobzol
Copy link
Member

@Kobzol Kobzol commented Jun 12, 2025

It corresponds 1:1 to the current bootstrap team, and with the new review preferences we shouldn't need it.

Discussed on Zulip.

r? @davidtwco

It corresponds 1:1 to the bootstrap team, and with the review preferences we shouldn't need it.
@rustbot rustbot added A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 12, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 12, 2025

triagebot.toml has been modified, there may have been changes to the review queue.

cc @davidtwco, @wesleywiser

@Kobzol
Copy link
Member Author

Kobzol commented Jun 12, 2025

@bors r=davidtwco rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 12, 2025

📌 Commit 7a0d0de has been approved by davidtwco

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 12, 2025
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2025
…p, r=davidtwco

Remove bootstrap adhoc group

It corresponds 1:1 to the current bootstrap team, and with the new review preferences we shouldn't need it.

Discussed on Zulip.

r? `@davidtwco`
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2025
Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #134536 (Lint on fn pointers comparisons in external macros)
 - #138164 (Infrastructure for lints during attribute parsing, specifically duplicate usages of attributes)
 - #141069 (Suggest mut when possbile for temporary value dropped while borrowed)
 - #141934 (resolve: Tweak `private_macro_use` lint to be compatible with upcoming macro prelude changes)
 - #142034 (Detect method not being present that is present in other tuple types)
 - #142402 (chore(doctest): Remove redundant blank lines)
 - #142406 (Note when enum variants shadow an associated function)
 - #142407 (Remove bootstrap adhoc group)
 - #142408 (Add myself (WaffleLapkin) to review rotation)
 - #142418 (Remove lower_arg_ty as all callers were passing `None`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2025
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #134536 (Lint on fn pointers comparisons in external macros)
 - #141069 (Suggest mut when possbile for temporary value dropped while borrowed)
 - #141934 (resolve: Tweak `private_macro_use` lint to be compatible with upcoming macro prelude changes)
 - #142034 (Detect method not being present that is present in other tuple types)
 - #142402 (chore(doctest): Remove redundant blank lines)
 - #142406 (Note when enum variants shadow an associated function)
 - #142407 (Remove bootstrap adhoc group)
 - #142408 (Add myself (WaffleLapkin) to review rotation)
 - #142418 (Remove lower_arg_ty as all callers were passing `None`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit fc010f8 into rust-lang:master Jun 13, 2025
10 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.89.0 milestone Jun 13, 2025
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2025
Rollup merge of #142407 - Kobzol:remove-bootstrap-adhoc-group, r=davidtwco

Remove bootstrap adhoc group

It corresponds 1:1 to the current bootstrap team, and with the new review preferences we shouldn't need it.

Discussed on Zulip.

r? ``@davidtwco``
@Kobzol Kobzol deleted the remove-bootstrap-adhoc-group branch June 13, 2025 03:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants