Skip to content

Conversation

Kobzol
Copy link
Member

@Kobzol Kobzol commented Jan 9, 2025

There is a difference between the image (the Dockerfile), the name of the job (which determines also its properties) and the full_name, which includes the auto/try/pr prefix.

Missed this in #134898.

There is a difference between the `image` (the Dockerfile), the `name` of the job (which determines also its properties) and the `full_name`, which includes the `auto/try/pr` prefix.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 9, 2025

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 9, 2025
@Kobzol
Copy link
Member Author

Kobzol commented Jan 9, 2025

@bors p=1000 (to unblock CI)

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job x86_64-gnu-tools failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404
curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404
ERROR: failed to download llvm from ci

    HELP: There could be two reasons behind this:
        1) The host triple is not supported for `download-ci-llvm`.
        2) Old builds get deleted after a certain time.
    HELP: In either case, disable `download-ci-llvm` in your config.toml:
    [llvm]
    download-ci-llvm = false
    
Build completed unsuccessfully in 0:00:22

@Kobzol
Copy link
Member Author

Kobzol commented Jan 9, 2025

An S3 archive has to be copied before CI can progress.

@tgross35 tgross35 closed this Jan 9, 2025
@tgross35 tgross35 reopened this Jan 9, 2025
@tgross35
Copy link
Contributor

This change is reasonably straightforward and makes sense to me, so I think it is okay to merge.

@bors r+ rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 10, 2025

📌 Commit c8b29d6 has been approved by tgross35

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 10, 2025
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 10, 2025

⌛ Testing commit c8b29d6 with merge 62bf38f...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 10, 2025

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: tgross35
Pushing 62bf38f to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jan 10, 2025
@bors bors merged commit 62bf38f into rust-lang:master Jan 10, 2025
9 of 13 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.86.0 milestone Jan 10, 2025
@tgross35
Copy link
Contributor

@bors treeclosed-

@Kobzol Kobzol deleted the ci-fix-name branch January 10, 2025 06:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants