Skip to content

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

Check impl's nested predicates as part of the recursive evaluate in consider_impl_candidate.

Unless, for some reason, these are intentionally not checked here -- in which case, I really don't understand where they're being checked...

r? @lcnr

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 3, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 3, 2023

Some changes occurred to the core trait solver

cc @lcnr

Copy link
Contributor

@lcnr lcnr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

r=me after nit

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r=lcnr

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 9, 2023

📌 Commit 36ee66c has been approved by lcnr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 9, 2023
JohnTitor pushed a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2023
…, r=lcnr

Check `impl`'s `where` clauses in `consider_impl_candidate` in experimental solver

Check impl's nested predicates as part of the recursive evaluate in `consider_impl_candidate`.

<sub>Unless, for some reason, these are intentionally **not** checked here -- in which case, I really don't understand where they're being checked...<sub>

r? `@lcnr`
Noratrieb added a commit to Noratrieb/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2023
…, r=lcnr

Check `impl`'s `where` clauses in `consider_impl_candidate` in experimental solver

Check impl's nested predicates as part of the recursive evaluate in `consider_impl_candidate`.

<sub>Unless, for some reason, these are intentionally **not** checked here -- in which case, I really don't understand where they're being checked...<sub>

r? ``@lcnr``
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2023
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#106321 (Collect and emit proper backtraces for `delay_span_bug`s)
 - rust-lang#106397 (Check `impl`'s `where` clauses in `consider_impl_candidate` in experimental solver)
 - rust-lang#106427 (Improve fluent error messages)
 - rust-lang#106570 (add tests for div_duration_* functions)
 - rust-lang#106648 (Polymorphization cleanup)
 - rust-lang#106664 (Remove unnecessary lseek syscall when using std::fs::read)
 - rust-lang#106709 (Disable "split dwarf inlining" by default.)
 - rust-lang#106715 (Autolabel and ping wg for changes to new solver)
 - rust-lang#106717 (fix typo LocalItemId -> ItemLocalId)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@BoxyUwU BoxyUwU added the WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver) label Jan 11, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 1693891 into rust-lang:master Jan 11, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.68.0 milestone Jan 11, 2023
@compiler-errors compiler-errors deleted the new-solver-impl-wc branch August 11, 2023 20:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants