@@ -354,31 +354,19 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
354354
355355crate fn expect_no_suffix ( diag : & Handler , sp : Span , kind : & str , suffix : Option < Symbol > ) {
356356 if let Some ( suf) = suffix {
357- let mut err = if kind == "a tuple index" &&
358- [ sym:: i32, sym:: u32, sym:: isize, sym:: usize] . contains ( & suf) {
359- // #59553: warn instead of reject out of hand to allow the fix to percolate
360- // through the ecosystem when people fix their macros
361- let mut err = diag. struct_span_warn (
362- sp,
363- & format ! ( "suffixes on {} are invalid" , kind) ,
364- ) ;
365- err. note ( & format ! (
366- "`{}` is *temporarily* accepted on tuple index fields as it was \
367- incorrectly accepted on stable for a few releases",
368- suf,
369- ) ) ;
357+ let mut err = diag. struct_span_err ( sp, & format ! ( "suffixes on {} are invalid" , kind) ) ;
358+
359+ if kind == "a tuple index"
360+ && [ sym:: i32, sym:: u32, sym:: isize, sym:: usize] . contains ( & suf)
361+ {
370362 err. help (
371363 "on proc macros, you'll want to use `syn::Index::from` or \
372- `proc_macro::Literal::*_unsuffixed` for code that will desugar \
373- to tuple field access",
374- ) ;
375- err. note (
376- "for more context, see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/60210" ,
364+ `proc_macro::Literal::*_unsuffixed` for code that will desugar \
365+ to tuple field access",
377366 ) ;
378- err
379- } else {
380- diag. struct_span_err ( sp, & format ! ( "suffixes on {} are invalid" , kind) )
381- } ;
367+ err. note ( "for more context, see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/60210" ) ;
368+ }
369+
382370 err. span_label ( sp, format ! ( "invalid suffix `{}`" , suf) ) ;
383371 err. emit ( ) ;
384372 }
0 commit comments