From 5adf17cb43d62e7e02c13f32def548b724bf2148 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:42:42 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Bring `manual_split_once` docs in line with other lint docs

---
 clippy_lints/src/methods/mod.rs | 11 +++++------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/clippy_lints/src/methods/mod.rs b/clippy_lints/src/methods/mod.rs
index b26d11c0d6b0..26c29fbb289c 100644
--- a/clippy_lints/src/methods/mod.rs
+++ b/clippy_lints/src/methods/mod.rs
@@ -1777,14 +1777,13 @@ declare_clippy_lint! {
 }
 
 declare_clippy_lint! {
-    /// **What it does:** Checks for usages of `str::splitn(2, _)`
-    ///
-    /// **Why is this bad?** `split_once` is both clearer in intent and slightly more efficient.
-    ///
-    /// **Known problems:** None.
+    /// ### What it does
+    /// Checks for usages of `str::splitn(2, _)`
     ///
-    /// **Example:**
+    /// ### Why is this bad?
+    /// `split_once` is both clearer in intent and slightly more efficient.
     ///
+    /// ### Example
     /// ```rust,ignore
     /// // Bad
     ///  let (key, value) = _.splitn(2, '=').next_tuple()?;