modernize the function sections in the reference #99
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Havvy
approved these changes
Aug 14, 2017
for example, "using a function as an item" does not require any indirection in any modern rustc. Also try to clarify function items vs. function pointers. This could be further improved, but is a start.
arielb1
force-pushed
the
modern-functions
branch
from
8325703 to
b40e519
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
for example, "using a function as an item" does not require any
indirection in any modern rustc. Also try to clarify function items vs.
function pointers.
This could be further improved, but is a start.