GPL-3.0 license and commercial use #1
Closed
MathieuDoyon
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Hey, to be honest, I didn’t overthink the license choice. Of course, I’d love for people to use this lib, and yeah, I just switched it to MIT. I’d really appreciate it if you could later add some real-world Parsec examples to the Readme! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
We'd love to use your library for our backend services, but we can't because of the GPL-3.0 license.
Like many companies, our policy prevents us from using GPL-3.0 software in our commercial products. The license terms don't work with our code, and our legal team won't approve it. We think this is a common problem that stops other businesses from using your library too.
Would you consider changing the license to something more permissive, like MIT or Apache 2.0? This would open up your project to a much larger audience and lead to more users and contributions.
We know changing a license is a big decision. We just wanted to share our perspective and start a conversation.
Thanks for your time and for making open-source tool.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions