Skip to content

feat: add isSentByFetch/fetchOpaque to urllib message #581

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 8, 2025

Conversation

killagu
Copy link
Member

@killagu killagu commented Jul 7, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced diagnostics messages now include additional metadata for fetch operations, providing more detailed context for requests and responses.
  • Chores

    • Updated diagnostics data structures to support new metadata fields for improved monitoring and troubleshooting.
    • Adjusted property type in fetch-related interface for improved data consistency.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 7, 2025

"""

Walkthrough

The changes introduce new optional properties, isSentByFetch and fetchOpaque, to diagnostics message types in both src/HttpClient.ts and src/fetch.ts. These properties allow diagnostics messages to indicate fetch-based requests and to carry fetch-specific opaque context data. No other logic or control flow modifications are present.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/HttpClient.ts Added optional isSentByFetch (boolean) and fetchOpaque (FetchOpaque) to diagnostics message types.
src/fetch.ts Added fetchOpaque (FetchOpaque) and isSentByFetch: true to diagnostics messages and their publishing logic.
src/FetchOpaqueInterceptor.ts Changed type of [symbols.kEnableRequestTiming] in FetchOpaque interface from number to boolean.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant FetchFactory
    participant DiagnosticsChannel

    Client->>FetchFactory: send request
    FetchFactory->>DiagnosticsChannel: publish request (isSentByFetch, fetchOpaque)
    FetchFactory->>DiagnosticsChannel: publish fetchRequest (fetchOpaque)
    FetchFactory->>DiagnosticsChannel: publish fetchResponse (fetchOpaque)
    FetchFactory->>DiagnosticsChannel: publish response (isSentByFetch, fetchOpaque)
    FetchFactory->>Client: return response
Loading

Possibly related PRs

  • feat: impl fetch #542: Extends diagnostics message types and channels with FetchOpaque and fetch-specific properties, directly related to the enhancements in this PR.

Suggested labels

enhancement

Suggested reviewers

  • fengmk2

Poem

In the warren of code, diagnostics grow,
With fetch and opaque, new insights now flow.
A hop and a skip, the messages gleam,
Marked by fetch journeys, a rabbit’s dream.
🐇✨
"""

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 ESLint

If the error stems from missing dependencies, add them to the package.json file. For unrecoverable errors (e.g., due to private dependencies), disable the tool in the CodeRabbit configuration.

src/FetchOpaqueInterceptor.ts

Oops! Something went wrong! :(

ESLint: 8.57.1

ESLint couldn't find the plugin "eslint-plugin-eggache".

(The package "eslint-plugin-eggache" was not found when loaded as a Node module from the directory "".)

It's likely that the plugin isn't installed correctly. Try reinstalling by running the following:

npm install eslint-plugin-eggache@latest --save-dev

The plugin "eslint-plugin-eggache" was referenced from the config file in ".eslintrc » eslint-config-egg/typescript » ./index.js".

If you still can't figure out the problem, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @killagu, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces new diagnostic capabilities to the urllib library, specifically for requests initiated via the fetch API. By adding isSentByFetch and fetchOpaque properties to various diagnostic message types, the system can now provide richer context, enabling better tracing, debugging, and understanding of the origin and specific details of fetch-driven network operations.

Highlights

  • Enhanced Diagnostic Messages: I've extended the RequestDiagnosticsMessage and ResponseDiagnosticsMessage types in src/HttpClient.ts to include two new optional properties: isSentByFetch (a boolean) and fetchOpaque (of type FetchOpaque). These additions provide more context for HTTP requests and responses within the urllib system.
  • Fetch-Specific Context: I've also updated the FetchDiagnosticsMessage and FetchResponseDiagnosticsMessage types in src/fetch.ts to include a fetchOpaque property. This ensures that diagnostic messages specifically related to fetch operations carry their associated opaque data.
  • Automatic Population of New Fields: The FetchFactory in src/fetch.ts has been modified to automatically populate these new diagnostic fields. When a request or response originates from a fetch call, the isSentByFetch flag is set to true, and the internalOpaque object is attached to the relevant diagnostic messages (channels.request, channels.response, channels.fetchRequest, channels.fetchResponse), covering both successful and error scenarios.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Jul 7, 2025

Open in StackBlitz

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/node-modules/urllib@581

commit: 3c29ee7

@killagu
Copy link
Member Author

killagu commented Jul 7, 2025

undici 的 dispatcher 对 options 进行修改时,无法影响到原始的 fetch init。因此在事件中引入 opaque 来对整个请求做串联。

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds isSentByFetch and fetchOpaque fields to the urllib diagnostic messages to provide more context, especially for requests originating from fetch. The changes are consistent and correctly propagate this new information.

However, I've identified a critical type mismatch related to the new fetchOpaque field. The internalOpaque object assigned to it does not conform to the FetchOpaque interface, which could lead to runtime errors. This should be addressed before merging.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 7, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.67%. Comparing base (5eaf790) to head (3c29ee7).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #581      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   95.64%   95.67%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          11       11              
  Lines        1355     1364       +9     
  Branches      313      313              
==========================================
+ Hits         1296     1305       +9     
  Misses         55       55              
  Partials        4        4              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Contributor

@akitaSummer akitaSummer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

1

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/FetchOpaqueInterceptor.ts (1)

8-16: Consider removing @ts-ignore comments and improving type safety.

The @ts-ignore comments suggest TypeScript is having issues with the symbol keys. Consider using a more type-safe approach for symbol-indexed properties or adding proper type declarations.

You could improve type safety by:

  1. Creating a proper type for the symbols
  2. Using mapped types or index signatures
  3. Adding type assertions instead of suppressing errors
-  // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/ban-ts-comment
-  // @ts-ignore
-  [symbols.kRequestId]: number;
-  // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/ban-ts-comment
-  // @ts-ignore
-  [symbols.kRequestStartTime]: number;
-  // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/ban-ts-comment
-  // @ts-ignore
-  [symbols.kEnableRequestTiming]: boolean;
+  [symbols.kRequestId as keyof FetchOpaque]: number;
+  [symbols.kRequestStartTime as keyof FetchOpaque]: number;
+  [symbols.kEnableRequestTiming as keyof FetchOpaque]: boolean;
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7e55057 and 3c29ee7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/FetchOpaqueInterceptor.ts (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (15)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (macos-latest, 22)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (windows-latest, 18)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (windows-latest, 16)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 16)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (macos-latest, 16)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 22)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (windows-latest, 22)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (windows-latest, 24)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (macos-latest, 20)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (windows-latest, 20)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (macos-latest, 24)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (macos-latest, 18)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 18)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 24)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 20)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/FetchOpaqueInterceptor.ts (1)

16-16: kEnableRequestTiming boolean change verified and approved

All usages of [symbols.kEnableRequestTiming] in HttpClient.ts, fetch.ts and diagnosticsChannel.ts now assign or check a boolean value. There are no numeric operations or comparisons on that property, so the switch from number to boolean is safe to merge.

As a minor cleanup, once your TypeScript setup fully supports computed symbol keys, you can remove the @ts-ignore directives around those properties in src/FetchOpaqueInterceptor.ts to restore full type‐checking.

@fengmk2 fengmk2 added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 8, 2025
Merged via the queue into master with commit d7e9f40 Jul 8, 2025
24 of 25 checks passed
@fengmk2 fengmk2 deleted the feat/fetch_message branch July 8, 2025 00:15
fengmk2 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2025
[skip ci]

## [4.8.0](v4.7.1...v4.8.0) (2025-07-08)

### Features

* add isSentByFetch/fetchOpaque to urllib message ([#581](#581)) ([d7e9f40](d7e9f40))
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants