Add typemap for command_line_args_get_argv (#2009)

* Add typemap for command_line_args_get_argv

* Add unit tests for `CommandLineArguments:get_{argc,argv}`

* Add python unit tests

* Fix python unit test

* `-OO` not `-00`

* Added sie append runtime to be consistent with the corresponding analyze.

* Added one c interface test, changed to only run unit_test.py for SIM_test_output_dir, and added helper class just to have some coding exercises :-)

* Slight formatting and static class changes

---------

Co-authored-by: Hong Chen <[email protected]>

Author: brendan-nasa

test/SIM_test_output_dir/RUN_test/unit_test.py

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+trick.stop(15)
+
+trick.sie_append_runtime_objs()
+
+from trick.unit_test import *
+
+trick_utest.unit_tests.enable()
+trick_utest.unit_tests.set_file_name(
+    os.getenv("TRICK_HOME") + "/trick_test/SIM_test_output_dir.xml"
+)
+trick_utest.unit_tests.set_test_name("CommandLineArgumentsTests")
+
+test_suite = "command_line_arguments"
+
+cpu = os.getenv("TRICK_HOST_CPU")
+
+expected_argv = [
+    f"./T_main_{cpu}_test.exe",
+    "RUN_test/unit_test.py",
+    "-OO",
+    "sim_output",
+    "--read-only-sim",
+]
+expected_argc = len(expected_argv)
+
+argc = trick.command_line_args_get_argc()
+argv = trick.command_line_args_get_argv()
+
+
+TRICK_EXPECT_EQ(expected_argc, argc, test_suite, "Expected argument count to match")
+
+TRICK_EXPECT_EQ(expected_argv, argv, test_suite, "Expected argument values to match")
+
+TRICK_EXPECT_EQ(expected_argv[0], argv[0], test_suite, "Expected first argument to match")
+
+TRICK_EXPECT_EQ(expected_argv[1], argv[1], test_suite, "Expected second argument to match")
+
+TRICK_EXPECT_EQ(expected_argv[2], argv[2], test_suite, "Expected third argument to match")
+
+TRICK_EXPECT_EQ(expected_argv[3], argv[3], test_suite, "Expected fourth argument to match")
+
+TRICK_EXPECT_EQ(expected_argv[4], argv[4], test_suite, "Expected fifth argument to match")

test_sims.yml

@@ -301,19 +301,19 @@ SIM_checkpoint_data_recording:
         - test/SIM_checkpoint_data_recording/RUN_test5/ref_log_foo.csv vs. test/SIM_checkpoint_data_recording/RUN_test5/log_foo.csv
     RUN_test6/unit_test.py:
       returns: 0
-      compare: 
+      compare:
         - test/SIM_checkpoint_data_recording/RUN_test6/ref_log_foo2.csv vs. test/SIM_checkpoint_data_recording/RUN_test6/log_foo2.csv
     RUN_test7/unit_test.py:
       returns: 0
-      compare: 
+      compare:
         - test/SIM_checkpoint_data_recording/RUN_test7/ref_log_fooChange.csv vs. test/SIM_checkpoint_data_recording/RUN_test7/log_fooChange.csv
     RUN_test8/unit_test.py:
       returns: 0
-      compare: 
+      compare:
         - test/SIM_checkpoint_data_recording/RUN_test8/ref_log_fooChange2.csv vs. test/SIM_checkpoint_data_recording/RUN_test8/log_fooChange2.csv
     RUN_test9/unit_test.py:
       returns: 0
-      compare: 
+      compare:
         - test/SIM_checkpoint_data_recording/RUN_test9/ref_log_foo2.csv vs. test/SIM_checkpoint_data_recording/RUN_test9/log_foo2.csv
 
 SIM_events:
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ SIM_events:
   binary: "T_main_{cpu}_test.exe"
   runs:
     RUN_test/unit_test.py:
-      returns: 0 
+      returns: 0
     RUN_test/unit_test_error1.py:
       returns: 255
     RUN_test/unit_test_error2.py:
@@ -334,15 +334,14 @@ SIM_events:
 
 SIM_test_output_dir:
   path: test/SIM_test_output_dir
-  build_args: "-t"  
+  build_args: "-t"
   binary: "T_main_{cpu}_test.exe"
   runs:
-    RUN_test/input.py -OO sim_output --read-only-sim:
+    RUN_test/unit_test.py -OO sim_output --read-only-sim:
       returns: 0
       analyze: 'python3 test/SIM_test_output_dir/ref_files/check_file_endings.py test/SIM_test_output_dir/ref_files/ref_compiletime_S_sie.resource test/SIM_test_output_dir/S_sie.resource'
       analyze: 'python3 test/SIM_test_output_dir/ref_files/check_file_endings.py test/SIM_test_output_dir/ref_files/ref_runtime_S_sie.resource test/SIM_test_output_dir/sim_output/RUN_test/S_sie.resource'
 
-
 # The variable server client and SIM_amoeba sometimes fail to connect and need to be retried
 
 # JMP (9/23/2023): We can't have these in our regular CI test suite if they are going to