-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.5k
[asan] isInterestingAlloca: remove the isAllocaPromotable condition #77221
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
57ce887
[𝘀𝗽𝗿] initial version
MaskRay 4d02224
rebase after base patch landed
MaskRay 4e5aa21
rename ClSkipPromotableAllocas
MaskRay 46d21cd
fix cl::desc
MaskRay ead3073
remove ClInstrumentUninterestingAllocas. this essentially restores th…
MaskRay c2eaead
revert an undeeded clang-format after restoring the original version…
MaskRay File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
isInterestingAlloca contains other checks. There is no point to have a flag to enable instrumentation of allocas which we can't instrument.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ClSkipPromotableAllocas on line 1315 is confusing, and maybe unnecessary?
but after your rename it's still confusing
this check applies only to accesses, there is other stuff done to instrument alloca, and ClSkipPromotableAllocas was applied there thru isInterestingAlloca
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In
ClInstrumentUninterestingAllocas=0 mode
, the condition!(SSGI && SSGI->isSafe(AI))
allows to ignore someAllocaInst
s thatSSGI->stackAccessIsSafe(*Inst)
will return false.My original thought is that
ClInstrumentUninterestingAllocas
isn't useful and we should just remove it.If you think
ClInstrumentUninterestingAllocas
is unnecessary, I will remove it.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, either keep as ClSkipPromotableAllocas=false, just in case, or remove it.
Something similar but not the same is not needed.