Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
Having a separate database for Secret Service is a common workflow. Secret Service is bound to a particular database and group so you can also just bury those entries somewhere. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Curious about how the community is using secret service integration. I'm not too happy about including their entries in my database as it is synced between multiple machines and would get unnecessarily polluted.
Off the top, the AutoOpen feature together with opening separate db used only for secret service comes to mind. Each system will have their own instance of auto-opened db at the same location, meaning the autoopen entry of the main db should work on all hosts.
Is this reasonable way to go about it, or are there other/better ideas?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions