Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 10, 2025. It is now read-only.

feat(aqua-compiler): JS-client aqua wrapper [fixes DXJ-461] #347

Merged
merged 42 commits into from
Sep 21, 2023

Conversation

akim-bow
Copy link
Contributor

@akim-bow akim-bow commented Sep 18, 2023

BEGIN_COMMIT_OVERRIDE
feat(aqua-compiler): JS-client aqua wrapper [fixes DXJ-461] (#347)

  • Implement wrapper compiler

  • Small formatting fixes

  • Add simple test

  • Package rename

  • Add new package to release-please

  • Misc fixes

  • Fix object type

  • Update package name

  • Revert "Fix object type"

This reverts commit 572f1e1.

  • Set string type

  • Make generator func async

  • Cleanup

  • Code refactoring

  • Fix PR comments

  • Fix file path

  • Refactor generate module

  • Change header text

  • Rename package

  • Move some deps to devDeps

  • Add a comment

  • New index file

  • Move aqua-api to devDeps

  • Add desc

  • Fix header

  • Change return type

  • Fix all tests

  • Fix func

  • Fix index file

  • Add file entry

  • Change package name (again)

  • Snapshot testing

  • Add func name

  • Fix return type

  • Fix nox images

  • Update aurora image

  • Conditional services

  • Use function instead classes

  • Refactor header

  • Import same type

  • Make named export

  • Type generator array
    END_COMMIT_OVERRIDE

@linear
Copy link

linear bot commented Sep 18, 2023

* limitations under the License.
*/

import { AquaFunction, CompilationResult } from '@fluencelabs/aqua-api/aqua-api.js';
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the new version of aqua api these will change a bit and mover to @fluencelabs/aqua-api directly. So watch out for that

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, thanks for the point

Copy link
Contributor

@shamsartem shamsartem left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the work

This was referenced Sep 21, 2023
@fluencebot fluencebot mentioned this pull request Nov 23, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
e2e Run e2e workflow
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants