Skip to content

[SPARK-8918] [MLLIB] [DOC] Add @since tags to mllib.clustering #8288

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 11 commits into from

Conversation

mengxr
Copy link
Contributor

@mengxr mengxr commented Aug 18, 2015

This continues the work from #8256. I removed @since tags from private/protected/local methods/variables (see 72fdeb6). @MechCoder

Closes #8256

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 18, 2015

Test build #41166 has finished for PR 8288 at commit 72fdeb6.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds the following public classes (experimental):
    • implicit class StringToColumn(val sc: StringContext)

@MechCoder
Copy link
Contributor

I made a pass and sent a Pull Request adding the missing tags. Please review and merge the changes (mengxr#3)

/** Maps given point to its cluster index. */
/**
* Maps given point to its cluster index.
* @since 1.4.0
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think 1.5.0 is better? Actually, the method exists in branch-1.4. However, it isn't v1.4.0 and v1.4.1.

@MechCoder
Copy link
Contributor

@yu-iskw It would be great if you could hold on your comments till @mengxr merges my pull request with this branch :) After that you could make a final pass

@yu-iskw
Copy link
Contributor

yu-iskw commented Aug 19, 2015

@MechCoder Alright. Thank you for letting me know.

@MechCoder
Copy link
Contributor

@mengxr thanks for the merge. @yu-iskw please give a final pass now. (I added quite a few missing tags)

@@ -223,12 +238,16 @@ class LocalLDAModel private[clustering] (
*
* @param documents test corpus to use for calculating log likelihood
* @return variational lower bound on the log likelihood of the entire corpus
* @since 1.3.0
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

According to my research , it is 1.5.0. This method was commented out in at least 1.3.0 and 1.4.0. So it might be grepped.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 19, 2015

Test build #41247 has finished for PR 8288 at commit d2e4849.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@yu-iskw
Copy link
Contributor

yu-iskw commented Aug 19, 2015

LGTM, minus above two things.

@mengxr
Copy link
Contributor Author

mengxr commented Aug 19, 2015

test this please

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 19, 2015

Test build #41268 has finished for PR 8288 at commit b5b9168.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2015
This continues the work from #8256. I removed `since` tags from private/protected/local methods/variables (see 72fdeb6). MechCoder

Closes #8256

Author: Xiangrui Meng <[email protected]>
Author: Xiaoqing Wang <[email protected]>
Author: MechCoder <[email protected]>

Closes #8288 from mengxr/SPARK-8918.

(cherry picked from commit 5b62bef)
Signed-off-by: Xiangrui Meng <[email protected]>
@mengxr
Copy link
Contributor Author

mengxr commented Aug 19, 2015

Merged into master and branch-1.5. Thanks @XiaoqingWang for the first version and @yu-iskw @MechCoder for review!

@XiaoqingWang Could you ping me on the JIRA page? So I can assign the ticket to you.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 5b62bef Aug 19, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants