Skip to content

[SPARK-4166][Core] Add a backward compatibility test for ExecutorLostFailure #3085

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[SPARK-4166][Core] Add a backward compatibility test for ExecutorLostFailure #3085

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

zsxwing
Copy link
Member

@zsxwing zsxwing commented Nov 4, 2014

No description provided.

@zsxwing
Copy link
Member Author

zsxwing commented Nov 4, 2014

/cc @andrewor14

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 4, 2014

Test build #22844 has started for PR 3085 at commit 89329f4.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@andrewor14
Copy link
Contributor

Ok, LGTM. I'll merge this when tests pass

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 4, 2014

Test build #22844 has finished for PR 3085 at commit 89329f4.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds the following public classes (experimental):
    • class NullType(PrimitiveType):
    • case class ScalaUdfBuilder[T: TypeTag](f: AnyRef)

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22844/
Test PASSed.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in b671ce0 Nov 4, 2014
@zsxwing zsxwing deleted the SPARK-4166-back-comp branch November 5, 2014 01:50
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2014
…Failure

Author: zsxwing <[email protected]>

Closes #3085 from zsxwing/SPARK-4166-back-comp and squashes the following commits:

89329f4 [zsxwing] Add a backward compatibility test for ExecutorLostFailure
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants