Replies: 1 comment
-
Tagging @Devatoria for visibility on this, also thinking if we should make this an issue rather than a discussion? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi DataDog Chaos Team!
I just wanted to reach out to see if you better understand how to troubleshoot the issue we are having. I currently don't have the time to fully deep dive into this issue but if there are any steps I can take let me know. We are running the controller on version 7.13.1
Our application pod
fault-injection-showcase
, consists of two containers, the application containerfault-injection-showcase
and anistio-proxy
containerWhen running a cpu-pressure experiment against my application, with this manifest
I find no evidence to suggest that the fault-injection-showcase container has increased cpu-pressure, only the istio-proxy container is showing 100% cpu pressure
The injector pod also reaches a Failed state after the duration. This only happens with the cpu-pressure experiments (not with state or network experiments)
However, if I specify the container in the manifest below
It correctly injects into the fault-injection-showcase container 100% cpu-pressure. Though the pod still fails.
I also ran one experiment where I specify both containers in the manifest istio-proxy and fault-injection-showcase
And I find that it targets all the necessary pods, but in one pod it injects the fault-injection-showcase containers (and not istio-proxy) and in the other pod it injects the istio-proxy (and not the fault-injection-showcase)
If you have any ideas on where to go about solving this, it would be greatly appreciated!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions