test(diff): Add more reference output variations for old configurations

Add reference files covering different floating point formatting
combinations for Max error = 1.0 with various 'over' formatting.

Signed-off-by: pmady <[email protected]>

Author: pmady

testsuite/diff/ref/out-nosimd-fmt6.txt

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Computing diff of "img1.exr" vs "img2.exr"
   121 pixels (2.95%) over 1e-06
 FAILURE
 Computing perceptual diff of "img1.exr" vs "img2.exr"
-  Max error  = 1 @ (5, 17, R)  values are 0.1, 0.1, 0.1 vs 0.1, 0.6, 0.1
+  Max error  = 1.0 @ (5, 17, R)  values are 0.1, 0.1, 0.1 vs 0.1, 0.6, 0.1
   121 pixels (2.95%) failed the perceptual test
 FAILURE
 Computing perceptual diff of "img1.exr" vs "img1.exr"
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Comparing "img1.exr" and "img2.exr"
   Mean error = 0
   RMS error = 0
   Peak SNR = 0
-  Max error  = 1 @ (5, 17, R)  values are 0.1, 0.1, 0.1 vs 0.1, 0.6, 0.1
+  Max error  = 1.0 @ (5, 17, R)  values are 0.1, 0.1, 0.1 vs 0.1, 0.6, 0.1
   0 pixels (0%) over 0.008
   121 pixels (2.95%) over 0.004
   121 pixels (2.9541%) failed the perceptual test
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ Comparing "img1.exr" and "img2.exr"
   Mean error = 0
   RMS error = 0
   Peak SNR = 0
-  Max error  = 1 @ (5, 17, R)  values are 0.1, 0.1, 0.1 vs 0.1, 0.6, 0.1
+  Max error  = 1.0 @ (5, 17, R)  values are 0.1, 0.1, 0.1 vs 0.1, 0.6, 0.1
   0 pixels (0%) over 0.008
   121 pixels (2.95%) over 1.0
   121 pixels (2.9541%) failed the perceptual test

testsuite/diff/ref/out-nosimd2.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+Comparing "img1.exr" and "img2.exr"
+64 x 64, 3 channels
+  Mean error = 0.0049235
+  RMS error = 0.049616
+  Peak SNR = 26.0876
+  Max error  = 0.5 @ (5, 17, G)  values are 0.1, 0.1, 0.1 vs 0.1, 0.6, 0.1
+  121 pixels (2.95%) over 0.008
+  121 pixels (2.95%) over 0.004
+FAILURE
+Computing diff of "img1.exr" vs "img2.exr"
+  Mean error = 0.0049235
+  RMS error = 0.049616
+  Peak SNR = 26.0876
+  Max error  = 0.5 @ (5, 17, G)  values are 0.1, 0.1, 0.1 vs 0.1, 0.6, 0.1
+  121 pixels (2.95%) over 1e-06
+  121 pixels (2.95%) over 1e-06
+FAILURE
+Computing perceptual diff of "img1.exr" vs "img2.exr"
+  Max error  = 1.0 @ (5, 17, R)  values are 0.1, 0.1, 0.1 vs 0.1, 0.6, 0.1
+  121 pixels (2.95%) failed the perceptual test
+FAILURE
+Computing perceptual diff of "img1.exr" vs "img1.exr"
+PASS
+Comparing "img1.exr" and "img2.exr"
+64 x 64, 3 channels
+  Mean error = 0
+  RMS error = 0
+  Peak SNR = 0
+  Max error  = 1.0 @ (5, 17, R)  values are 0.1, 0.1, 0.1 vs 0.1, 0.6, 0.1
+  0 pixels (0%) over 0.008
+  121 pixels (2.95%) over 0.004
+  121 pixels (2.9541%) failed the perceptual test
+FAILURE
+Comparing "img1.exr" and "img1.exr"
+PASS
+Comparing "img1.exr" and "img2.exr"
+64 x 64, 3 channels
+  Mean error = 0
+  RMS error = 0
+  Peak SNR = 0
+  Max error  = 1.0 @ (5, 17, R)  values are 0.1, 0.1, 0.1 vs 0.1, 0.6, 0.1
+  0 pixels (0%) over 0.008
+  121 pixels (2.95%) over 1
+  121 pixels (2.9541%) failed the perceptual test
+FAILURE

testsuite/diff/ref/out-nosimd3.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+Comparing "img1.exr" and "img2.exr"
+64 x 64, 3 channels
+  Mean error = 0.0049235
+  RMS error = 0.049616
+  Peak SNR = 26.0876
+  Max error  = 0.5 @ (5, 17, G)  values are 0.1, 0.1, 0.1 vs 0.1, 0.6, 0.1
+  121 pixels (2.95%) over 0.008
+  121 pixels (2.95%) over 0.004
+FAILURE
+Computing diff of "img1.exr" vs "img2.exr"
+  Mean error = 0.0049235
+  RMS error = 0.049616
+  Peak SNR = 26.0876
+  Max error  = 0.5 @ (5, 17, G)  values are 0.1, 0.1, 0.1 vs 0.1, 0.6, 0.1
+  121 pixels (2.95%) over 1e-06
+  121 pixels (2.95%) over 1e-06
+FAILURE
+Computing perceptual diff of "img1.exr" vs "img2.exr"
+  Max error  = 1.0 @ (5, 17, R)  values are 0.1, 0.1, 0.1 vs 0.1, 0.6, 0.1
+  121 pixels (2.95%) failed the perceptual test
+FAILURE
+Computing perceptual diff of "img1.exr" vs "img1.exr"
+PASS
+Comparing "img1.exr" and "img2.exr"
+64 x 64, 3 channels
+  Mean error = 0
+  RMS error = 0
+  Peak SNR = 0
+  Max error  = 1.0 @ (5, 17, R)  values are 0.1, 0.1, 0.1 vs 0.1, 0.6, 0.1
+  0 pixels (0%) over 0.008
+  121 pixels (2.95%) over 0.004
+  121 pixels (2.9541%) failed the perceptual test
+FAILURE
+Comparing "img1.exr" and "img1.exr"
+PASS
+Comparing "img1.exr" and "img2.exr"
+64 x 64, 3 channels
+  Mean error = 0
+  RMS error = 0
+  Peak SNR = 0
+  Max error  = 1.0 @ (5, 17, R)  values are 0.1, 0.1, 0.1 vs 0.1, 0.6, 0.1
+  0 pixels (0%) over 0.008
+  121 pixels (2.95%) over 1.0
+  121 pixels (2.9541%) failed the perceptual test
+FAILURE