Feature: QSPI support on DISCO_F769NI

[screamerbg]

Description

The DISCO_F769NI has quite large QSPI flash on board, but unfortunately the target support is lacking the QSPI "device_has" flag and also qspi_s definies in objects.h. Could you please add QSPI (and QSPIF feature) support for it?

CC @ARMmbed/team-st-mcd

Issue request type

[ ] Question
[X] Enhancement
[ ] Bug

[screamerbg]

Also cc @MarceloSalazar

[ciarmcom]

Internal Jira reference: https://jira.arm.com/browse/MBOCUSTRIA-196

[jeromecoutant]

Hi
Not so easy as DISCO_F769NI is using MX25L51245G which is not described yet in the test directory.
Thx

[jeromecoutant]

Maybe you can check
https://github.com/jeromecoutant/mbed/commits/DEV_QSPI_TEST
Thx

[jeromecoutant]

Current status with the above branch:

mbed test -t xxx -m xxx -v –n components-storage-blockdevice-component_qspif-tests-block_device-qspif

• F469: OK
• F746: OK
• F769: FAILED (wrong device Id)
• L475: OK
• L476: OK
• L496: FAILED (hard fault)

@screamerbg could you add QSPI expert in this issue discussion ?

Thx

[screamerbg]

CC @offirko @dannybenor

[offirko]

@jeromecoutant - could you attach the full logs at the Jira or here , or send me by mail?
I do not have the F769 or L496 boards, and I cant find them at any of the CI sites either.

CC @maciejbocianski

[dannybenor]

@jeromecoutant is F769 passing the HAL tests for QSPI?

[jeromecoutant]

No, but DISCO_F769 has a new QSPI : MX25L51245G
which doesn't have a clean flash config configuration file...

[offirko]

@jeromecoutant - I believe qspif-blockdevice tests should only be run on the new targets after tests-mbed_hal-qspi tests are successful.

[offirko]

@screamerbg - I've received the DISCO_F769NI you sent. After making a small update to target hal and QSPIF BD fix the device works well. I'm not sure whether I can use this PR to deliver the changes.. or should I open a new PR?